+91 954 000 2184
+91 7289 800 700
[email protected]
Taxo logo
shopping_basket
Product has been added to your cart.

Latest Articles

Providing Shipping Bills Of Intangible Goods Not Possible – Orders Rejecting Refund In Case Of Supply of Electricity Set Aside– Andhra Pradesh High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Recoveries On Account Of Notice Pay, Bond Forfeiture, Canteen Charges, ID Cards Replacement As Well As The Liquidated Damages & Forfeiture Of Earnest Money and Security Deposit Not Taxable Under GST – AAR Haryana

Varun Gaba

Assessee Cannot Be Deprived Of Its Livelihood By Cancelling The GST Registration – Rajasthan High Court

Manish Gupta

Clandestine Removal Of Goods Cannot Be Alleged Merely On The Basis Of The Diary Entries – CESTAT Allahabad

Deepa Saluja

Order Without Digital Signature Will Have No Effect In The Eyes Of Law – Limitation For Filing Appeal Will Start From Date Of Signature – Bombay High Court

Lovey Singhal

Every Administrative Authority Or A Quasi-Judicial Authority Should Indicate The Reasons – Non-Speaking Order Set Aside – Allahabad High Court

Varun Gaba

Renting Of Residential Dwelling Not For Use In Course Or Furtherance Of Business Would be Exempt Under GST – Delhi High Court

Smilly Kinra

Pre-deposit For Filing An Appeal Can Be Made From The Credit Available In Electronic Credit Ledger – Bombay High Court

Manish Gupta

Cancelling Registration By An Order Beyond The Scope Of SCN And Without Issuance Of Notice In Terms Of Rule 25 Not Sustainable – Delhi High Court

Deepa Saluja

Parallel Proceedings By Different Wings Of The Same Department For The Same Period Not Permissible – Calcutta High Court

Lovey Singhal

Detention Proceedings Under Section 129 Cannot Be Converted To Confiscation Proceedings – E Way Bill – Karnataka High Court

Smilly Kinra

Premium Charged For Interest Restructuring Is Nothing But The Value Of Loss Of Interest Caused To The Lender – Department Appeal Dismissed – CESTAT, Delhi

Varun Gaba

Provisional Attachment Order Passed Ignoring The Basic Ingredients Of Section 83 Of The CGST Act, Is Arbitrary And Illegal – Cost Imposed On the Officers – Allahabad High Court

Kritika Bhandari

GST Department Does Not Recognise The Concept Of ‘Working Day’ And ‘Holiday’ In Case Of Interception, Detention & Seizure – E-Way Bill – Madras high Court

Lovey Singhal

Legally Flawed Proceedings Cancelling The Registration Of The Assessee Not Sustainable – Delhi High Court

Varun Gaba

Cleaning & Maintenance Of Toilets At Bus Stations Is Exempt From Payment Of GST – Andhra Pradesh High Court

Deepa Saluja

Another Opportunity To Present The Case Granted When There Is No Intent To Evade Tax – E-Way Bill – Delhi High Court

Manish Gupta

Circular Would Be Applicable Retrospectively – Refund In Case Of Inverted Duty Structure Allowed – Telangana High Court

Lovey Singhal

Proceedings Under Section 129 Not To Be Invoked In Case Of Bonafide and Clerical Mistakes – E-Way Bill – Madhya Pradesh High Court

Deepa Saluja

Investigation Initiated After Filing Of Application Cannot Be A Bar In Admitting The Advance Ruling Application – Telangana High Court

Kritika Bhandari

The Officer Is Duty Bound To Consider The Explanation Provided By The Assessee For Expiry of E-Way Bill – Kerala High Court

Varun Gaba

Orders Passed Without Considering The Assessees Request Seeking Extension Of Time For Filing SCN Reply Not Valid – Punjab & Haryana High Court

Smilly Kinra

Goods Not To Be Detained When Particulars Could Not Be Filled In The E-Way Bill Due To Shortcomings Of The Portal – Allahabad High Court

Mansi Thukral

Cancellation of the registration of the assessee without quantification of tax liability would be against the interest of revenue – Calcutta High Court

Manish Gupta

Attaching Bank Account Without Issuance Of An Order In Form DRC – 07 And Proper Opportunity Of Hearing Not Sustainable – Jharkhand High Court

Deepa Saluja

Penalty not to be imposed on expiry of E-way Bill if there is no intent to evade tax- Madhya Pradesh High Court

Varun Gaba

Interest cannot be demanded without initiating any adjudication proceedings under Section 73 or 74 – Jharkhand High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Voluntary Payment Under Section 129 For Release Of Goods Does Not Take Away The Right Of Filing Appeal – E-Way Bill – Kerala High Court

Smilly Kinra

Vague Orders Cancelling The Registration Are Against The Principles Of Adjudication By The Quasi-Judicial Authorities – Allahabad High Court

Lovey Singhal

Time Line For Filing And Revising TRAN – 1 Cannot Be Same – Madras High Court

Mansi Thukral

Proceedings Under Section 129(3) Against The Goods Lying In The Godown Is Without Jurisdiction – Allahabad High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Non-Speaking One-Line Order Dismissing The Appeal For Delay In Filing Is Not Valid – Calcutta High Court

Smilly Kinra

Tax, Penalty Not To Be Imposed Under Section 129 In Case Of Bonafide Mistakes – E-Way Bill – Allahabad High Court

Manish Gupta

No Recovery Of Tax Without Issuance Of Order Under Section 74(9) of CGST Act, 2017 – Calcutta High Court

Varun Gaba

Relaxation Of Limitation Granted To Revocation Application Would Also Be Applicable To Filing Of Appeal – Allahabad High Court

Mansi Thukral

Detention Proceedings Initiated And Concluded On The Same Date Not Sustainable – E-Way Bill – Jharkhand High Court

Deepa Saluja

Additional Evidence At The Appellate Stage To Be Accepted On Sufficient Cause Being Shown – Andhra Pradesh High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Adopted Criminal Jurisprudence In The Country Rest On Presumption Of Innocence – Bail Granted – Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Manish Gupta

Blocking Bank Account Without Following The Procedure Under Section 83 Is Not Sustainable – Delhi High Court

Smilly Kinra

Summons to be issued as last resort – Delhi High Court

Lovey Singhal

Statutory Interest On Refund Cannot Be Withheld On Account Of Supreme Court’s Order Of Extension Of Limitation – Delhi High Court

Varun Gaba

Condonable period is also covered by the Supreme Court suo-moto order for extension of limitation – Delhi High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Registration May Not Be Cancelled On Mere Whims And Fancies Of The Proper Officer – Allahabad High Court

Mansi Thukral

Debiting Electronic Credit Ledger Is Not Maintainable When Appeal Under Section 107 Already Filed – Calcutta High Court

Smilly Kinra

Non-Speaking order enhancing the demand beyond the scope of show cause notice not sustainable – Andhra Pradesh High Court

Anu Chokker

No Recovery Under Section 78 Can Be Initiated Before Expiry Of Limitation For Filing Appeal – Calcutta High Court

Deepa Saluja

Customer’s Customer Can Not Be Your Customer”- Service Provided to Subscriber Of Foreign Telecom Operator Is Export of Service- Refund Allowed: Bombay High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Circular Taxing Annuity Being Contradictory To The Exemption Notifications Is Not Sustainable – Karnataka High Court

Smelly Kinra

GST Common Portal Ordered To Be Opened For Two Months For Filing Tran-1 & Tran-2 – Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Varun Gaba

Order Passed Considering Inspection Report As Deemed Show Cause Notice Is Not Valid – Jharkhand High Court

Varun Gaba

Register Today

Menu