+91 9540 002 186
+91 7289 800 700
[email protected]
Taxo logo
shopping_basket
Product has been added to your cart.

Latest Articles

The Officer Is Duty Bound To Consider The Explanation Provided By The Assessee For Expiry of E-Way Bill – Kerala High Court

Varun Gaba

Orders Passed Without Considering The Assessees Request Seeking Extension Of Time For Filing SCN Reply Not Valid – Punjab & Haryana High Court

Smilly Kinra

Goods Not To Be Detained When Particulars Could Not Be Filled In The E-Way Bill Due To Shortcomings Of The Portal – Allahabad High Court

Mansi Thukral

Cancellation of the registration of the assessee without quantification of tax liability would be against the interest of revenue – Calcutta High Court

Manish Gupta

Attaching Bank Account Without Issuance Of An Order In Form DRC – 07 And Proper Opportunity Of Hearing Not Sustainable – Jharkhand High Court

Deepa Saluja

Penalty not to be imposed on expiry of E-way Bill if there is no intent to evade tax- Madhya Pradesh High Court

Varun Gaba

Interest cannot be demanded without initiating any adjudication proceedings under Section 73 or 74 – Jharkhand High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Voluntary Payment Under Section 129 For Release Of Goods Does Not Take Away The Right Of Filing Appeal – E-Way Bill – Kerala High Court

Smilly Kinra

Vague Orders Cancelling The Registration Are Against The Principles Of Adjudication By The Quasi-Judicial Authorities – Allahabad High Court

Lovey Singhal

Time Line For Filing And Revising TRAN – 1 Cannot Be Same – Madras High Court

Mansi Thukral

Proceedings Under Section 129(3) Against The Goods Lying In The Godown Is Without Jurisdiction – Allahabad High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Non-Speaking One-Line Order Dismissing The Appeal For Delay In Filing Is Not Valid – Calcutta High Court

Smilly Kinra

Tax, Penalty Not To Be Imposed Under Section 129 In Case Of Bonafide Mistakes – E-Way Bill – Allahabad High Court

Manish Gupta

No Recovery Of Tax Without Issuance Of Order Under Section 74(9) of CGST Act, 2017 – Calcutta High Court

Varun Gaba

Relaxation Of Limitation Granted To Revocation Application Would Also Be Applicable To Filing Of Appeal – Allahabad High Court

Mansi Thukral

Detention Proceedings Initiated And Concluded On The Same Date Not Sustainable – E-Way Bill – Jharkhand High Court

Deepa Saluja

Additional Evidence At The Appellate Stage To Be Accepted On Sufficient Cause Being Shown – Andhra Pradesh High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Adopted Criminal Jurisprudence In The Country Rest On Presumption Of Innocence – Bail Granted – Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Manish Gupta

Blocking Bank Account Without Following The Procedure Under Section 83 Is Not Sustainable – Delhi High Court

Smilly Kinra

Summons to be issued as last resort – Delhi High Court

Lovey Singhal

Statutory Interest On Refund Cannot Be Withheld On Account Of Supreme Court’s Order Of Extension Of Limitation – Delhi High Court

Varun Gaba

Condonable period is also covered by the Supreme Court suo-moto order for extension of limitation – Delhi High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Registration May Not Be Cancelled On Mere Whims And Fancies Of The Proper Officer – Allahabad High Court

Mansi Thukral

Debiting Electronic Credit Ledger Is Not Maintainable When Appeal Under Section 107 Already Filed – Calcutta High Court

Smilly Kinra

Non-Speaking order enhancing the demand beyond the scope of show cause notice not sustainable – Andhra Pradesh High Court

Anu Chokker

No Recovery Under Section 78 Can Be Initiated Before Expiry Of Limitation For Filing Appeal – Calcutta High Court

Deepa Saluja

Customer’s Customer Can Not Be Your Customer”- Service Provided to Subscriber Of Foreign Telecom Operator Is Export of Service- Refund Allowed: Bombay High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Circular Taxing Annuity Being Contradictory To The Exemption Notifications Is Not Sustainable – Karnataka High Court

Smelly Kinra

GST Common Portal Ordered To Be Opened For Two Months For Filing Tran-1 & Tran-2 – Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Varun Gaba

Order Passed Considering Inspection Report As Deemed Show Cause Notice Is Not Valid – Jharkhand High Court

Varun Gaba

Refund of unutilized credit allowed when there is a bar in carrying it forward in TRAN – 1 – Madras High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Limitation For Filing The Appeal Would Be Considered From The Date Of Uploading Demand In Form DRC – 07 On The Portal – Kerala High Court

Smelly Kinra

20.07.2022: Mismatch of vehicle number in case of stock transfer does not give rise to illegality in transport of goods – Eway Bill – Section 129 – Telangana High Court

Deepa Saluja

Order Passed Rejecting The Adjournment Application Is Not Valid – Allahabad High Court

Smelly Kinra

Protective demand notice premature when the matter is at the appellate stage – Delhi High Court

Mansi Thukral

Credit Allowed To Be Carried Forward In GSTR – 3B If Not Feasible To Open The Portal For Filing Revised Tran – 1- Bombay High Court

Anu Chokker

Vehicle Not To Be Detained Under Section 129 When Diversion Is Due To Human Error – Karnataka High Court

Deepa Saluja

Writ Can Be Entertained Against The Order Dismissing The Appeal As Time Barred- Uttarakhand High Court

Smelly Kinra

Goods Cannot Be Detained If Procedure Is Not Followed Under Section 129- Madras High Court

Kritika Bhandari

No Recovery Of Tax, If Assessment Order Is Passed Without Issuing Show Cause Notice- Madras High Court

Mansi Thukral

BENEFIT OF ITC NOT TO BE DENIED IF TRANSACTIONS ARE GENUINE – CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Deepa Saluja

Garnishee Order Becomes Infructuous On Appeal Being Filed Under Section 107 Of The CGST Act – Jharkhand High Court

Smelly Kinra

Business Premises Ordered To Be De-Sealed To Carry On The Business Operations- Hon’ble Delhi High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Refund of IGST on Zero rated supply allowed when mistake committed was later on rectified – Delhi High Court

Anu Chhoker

Alternative Remedy Not Always A Bar To Entertain The Writ Petition – Stay Granted – Calcutta High Court

Smelly Kinra

Unjust Enrichment Shall Not Be Applicable To Refund Of Pre-Deposit – CESTAT Mumbai

Deepa Saluja

A Voluntary Statement Cannot Substitute A Statutory Requirement Of Pre- Show Cause Notice Consultation Under Rule 142(1A) – Delhi High Court

Mansi Thukral

Authorities Need To Honour The Valid E-Way Bill Produced – Tripura High Court

Deepa Saluja

Procedures Under Rule 96 Of CGST Cannot Be Applied To Deny The Legitimate Export Incentive – Madras High Court

Kritika Bhandari

Order Of Provisional Attachment Under Section 83 On The Basis Of Opinion Formed Without Tangible Material Is Invalid – Madras High Court

Anu Chhoker

Register Today

Menu