+91 9540 002 186
+91 7289 800 700
[email protected]
Home
Portfolio
Master Course on UAE Corporate TAX
TAXO PRO
TAXO GST 360
TAXO Webinars
UAE Corporate TAX
Fundamentals of GST
What’s New
Query
Free Trial
Events
Login
shopping_basket
Product
has been added to your cart.
INR (₹)
USD ($)
Latest Articles
Damages received from tenants due to early termination of sub-lease agreement, liable to GST: Karnataka AAR
Kartika Jain
Sinking fund collected in addition to regular maintenance amounts by Residential Society from its members, taxable under GST: West Bengal AAR
Manisha Gupta
Unsigned Order Is No Order In The Eyes Of Law – Andhra Pradesh High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Limitation Under Section 54 Is Directory In Nature Not Mandatory – Madras High Court
Kartika Jain
Notice Under Section 129(3) Is To Be Issued Within Seven Days – E-Way Bill – Madras High Court
Varun Gaba
Interest Is To Be Remitted From Expiry Of 60 Days Even If The Refund Is Filed Offline – Section 54 – Allahabad High Court
Manish Gupta
Notice To Be Served On Legal Representative In Case Of Demise Of Proprietor – Allahabad High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Interest Not To Be Deducted, When There Is No Loss To Revenue, On The Refund Of Amount Wrongly Carried Forward Under Section – 140, – Madras High Court
Varun Gaba
Rectification of the bonafide and inadvertent mistakes committed at the time of filing/submitting of GST Forms/ Returns
Ashish Tahalyani
Introducing Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed statement on GSTN
CA Lovey Singhal
No Provision In The Act Requiring Taxpayer To Seek A NOC For Moving An Application For Revocation Of Cancellation Of Registration – Delhi High Court
Varun Gaba
When supplier fails to deposit the collected tax, ITC claim to be denied to purchaser: Patna HC
Kartika Jain
A Communication Under Section 83 Issued By Any Officer Other Than The Commissioner Is Without Authority Of Law – Delhi High Court
Deepa Saluja
Appeal/Writ Entertained After Two Years Of the Order – Tax, Penalty Not To Be Levied When There Is No Intent To Evade Payment Of Tax – E-way Bill – Calcutta High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Demand on Account of GSTR2B & 3B Mismatch and Legal Interpretation, Legal Sustainability
Amrita
No automatic reversal of ITC from the buyer upon non-payment of tax by the supplier: Calcutta High Court
Kartika Jain
Revenue Cannot Withhold The Cash Recovered During Search Under Section 67 Without Seizing The Same – Delhi High Court
Varun Gaba
Amount Deposited Voluntarily During Search Not To Be Considered As Collection Of Tax With Authority Of Law – Punjab & Haryana High Court
Varun Gaba
Imposing 200% Penalty For Not Renewing The Expired E-Way Bill Not Sustainable – Calcutta High Court
Manish Gupta
Assessees Accounts Not To Be Attached If There Seems To Be Default On The Part Of Another Taxable Person – Delhi High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Show Cause Notice Being Beyond Pecuniary Jurisdiction Quashed – Telangana High Court
Deepa Saluja
Claim Of ITC Not To Be Denied If The Registration Of The Supplier Was Cancelled Subsequent To The Transaction – Calcutta High Court
Varun Gaba
Penalty Not To Be Imposed On The Whole Consignment For Shortage In Quantity Of Goods – E-Way Bill – Calcutta High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Appeal Stands Abated On The Demise Of The Proprietor – CESTAT, Chennai
Lovey Singhal
Presence Of Advocate During Interrogation Under Section 70 Allowed – Bombay High Court
Deepa Saluja
Additional Tax liability Incurred On Introduction Of GST To Be Refunded To The Contractors – Chhattisgarh High Court
Manish Gupta
Show Cause Notice Without Relevant Material & Information Disabling The Assessee To Respond Not Valid – Madhya Pradesh High Court
Deepa Saluja
Bail Granted Considering The Fact That Maximum Sentence Awarded Can Be 5 Years And The Co-Accused Have Already Been Granted Bail – Punjab And Haryana High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Deeming Fiction In Terms Of Notification 11/2017 Would Be Applicable Only Where The Assessee Is Unable To Provide The Bifurcation Of Construction Services or Sale Of Land – Madras High Court
Varun Gaba
Seizure Of Cash Not Forming Part Of Stock In Trade Wholly Unwarranted – Cash Directed To Be Released – Kerala High Court
Manish Gupta
Registration Can Only Be Cancelled In Terms Of Conditions Prescribed Under Section 29(2) of the GST Act – Allahabad High Court
Deepa Saluja
Input Tax Credit On Construction Of Hotel Building Admissible And Not Restricted By Section 17(5) – Tripura High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Revenue Not To Ignore Order Passed By Appellate Authority – Refund Claim Withheld On The Ground That Revenue Proposes To File An Appeal Directed To Be Released – Delhi High Court
Lovey Singhal
No Penalty Under Section 129(3) Can Be Imposed Without Providing Hearing As Prescribed Under Section 129(4) – E-Way Bill – Patna High Court
Varun Gaba
A Person Who Supplies the Goods and Services On His Own Account Cannot Be Considered As Intermediary – Delhi High Court
Manish Gupta
Notices in Form GST ASMT – 10 Issued Without Authorization Of The Proper Officer (Chief Commissioner) are not Valid – Andhra Pradesh High Court
Deepa Saluja
Four Months Under Section 107 Can Be 121 Or 122 Days – Appeal Filed On 121st Day Restored – Allahabad High Court
Varun Gaba
Limitation To Be Considered From The Date Of Online Filing Of Refund Application Not Manual Filing – Bombay High Court
Manish Gupta
Interest Can Be Charged On The Cash Component Of The Demand And Not On Credit Component – Madras High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Refund Of ITC Not To Be Rejected Merely Because Of Suspicion If The Supplier Has Been Booked For Issuing Fake Invoices – Delhi High Court
Varun Gaba
Taxability Of Discounts, Vouchers, Coupons & Gift Cards Under GST Regime
Amrita
Save the date June 30, 2023 for Amnesty Scheme
Sandeep Saini
Interest To Be Charged Only In Case Of Utilization Of Credit – Madras High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Refund Not To Be Withheld On The Ground That Revenue Is In Process Of Filing An Appeal Against The Refund Sanction Order – Delhi High Court
Varun Gaba
Non-submission Of Reply To The Show Cause Notice Cannot Be A Ground For Cancellation Of Registration – Allahabad High Court
Lovey Singhal
Corporate Guarantee To Group Companies Without Consideration Not Taxable – Supreme Court
Kritika Bhandari
Amendment To Rule 89 (4C) Of The CGST Rules Held Ultra vires & Invalid, And Consequently Quashed – Karnataka High Court
Varun Gaba
Pre-deposit For Filing Appeal Reduced To 2.5% When The Assessee Does Not Have The Adequate Funds – Delhi High Court
Deepa Saluja
Directing Party To The Assessee To Stop Payment Through A Summon Under Section 70 Is Beyond Jurisdiction – Andhra Pradesh High Court
Kritika Bhandari
Imposing Heavy Penalty Not Sustainable When E-way Bill Expired During The Transit And the Assessee Was Not In A Position To Renew The Same – Tripura High Court
Varun Gaba
«
1
2
3
4
…
7
»
Register Today
Loading…
Menu