2023 Taxo. online 655

Lost in the GST Maze: Did a Notification Oversight Cost a Taxpayer Millions?

Introduction:

The labyrinthine world of taxation often leads to complex disputes between taxpayers and tax authorities. In a recent case before the Kerala High Court, a taxpayer found themselves entangled in a web of legal intricacies concerning the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Act. This article delves into the case of S.K. ELDHOSE v. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & 3 ORS. and explores the implications of the court’s decision.

What Happened:

S.K. ELDHOSE, a proprietorship firm with both Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) and Kerala State Goods and Service Tax (KSGST) registration, was served with a notice under Section 61 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, and Rule 99(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The notice alleged that the petitioner had claimed excess Input Tax Credit (ITC) during the 2017-2018 financial year, a violation of Section 16(2)(c) of the GST Act.

In response to the notice, the petitioner explained their position and pointed out discrepancies. However, the matter took an unexpected turn when the petitioner received a revenue recovery notice demanding a substantial amount. To their surprise, they had not received any formal order in response to the initial notice. Upon further investigation, the petitioner discovered that an assessment order had been passed, but the same had not been brought to their attention.

Why It Happened:

The core issue in this case revolves around the alleged violation of Section 16(2)(c) of the GST Act and the subsequent proceedings. The petitioner claimed that the assessment order, which formed the basis for the revenue recovery notice, was passed on entirely different grounds from what was initially presented in the notice.

The crux of the matter lay in the petitioner’s assertion that they were not notified of the assessment order and, therefore, could not exercise their statutory right to file an appeal within the prescribed time frame under Section 107 of the GST Act. This contention gave rise to a legal conundrum: should the petitioner’s inability to file an appeal due to lack of notification be a valid reason for the court to intervene?

Analysis & Impact:

The Kerala High Court’s decision in this case raises important legal and procedural questions. On one hand, the court acknowledged the petitioner’s argument that they were unaware of the assessment order, which led to the delay in filing an appeal. However, the court also cited precedents that emphasize the strict adherence to the statutory time limits for filing appeals in tax matters.

 

To read more about this Judgement, subscribe today: https://taxo.online/product/taxo-pro/

Already a subscriber, Click to LOGIN & refer to the TAXO GST LAWS

     Or

Call us:- +91 99101 67919, 99996 93426