| March 3, 2026 |
03.03.2026: Right to claim refund of accumulated unutilised ITC under Section 54(1) read with Section 54(3) accrues on the “relevant date”, Once accrued, such right cannot be retrospectively restricted by an executive circular: Calcutta High Court |
| March 3, 2026 |
03.03.2026: When objections are filed against attachment, the authority is bound to pass a speaking and reasoned order, Failure to record reasons renders the attachment unsustainable: Bombay High Court |
| March 2, 2026 |
02.03.2026: Orders under Section 74 involving serious tax demands must strictly comply with principles of natural justice: Madras High Court |
| March 2, 2026 |
02.03.2026: Penalty under Section 129 cannot be mechanically imposed where no tax is payable: Gujarat High Court |
| February 28, 2026 |
28.02.2026: Section 54 limitation is inapplicable where the amount paid does not legally qualify as “tax due,” but is an erroneous or mistaken deposit: Orissa High Court |
| February 28, 2026 |
28.02.2026: Search and seizure powers under GST are subject to judicial scrutiny and cannot be exercised indefinitely without statutory backing: Madras High Court |
| February 27, 2026 |
27.02.2026: Mechanical confirmation of an adjudication order without independent analysis amounts to non-application of mind: Calcutta High Court |
| February 27, 2026 |
27.02.2026: Classification depends on the nature of supply, not merely on the product: Gujarat, AAR |
| February 26, 2026 |
26.02.2026: Mobilisation advance in works contracts is taxable under GST, merely describing payment as a “loan” does not alter its character if it is adjusted against contract value: Gujarat AAR |
| February 26, 2026 |
26.02.2026: Verification reports relied upon in adjudication must be furnished to the assessee; otherwise, it amounts to violation of natural justice: Bombay High Court |
| February 25, 2026 |
25.02.2026: Personal recovery from a Director under Section 89 arises only when tax dues cannot be recovered from the private company: Madras High Court |
| February 25, 2026 |
25.02.2026: Interest Not Demanded in Show-Cause Notice Cannot Be Confirmed in Adjudication Order under Section 73: Allahabad High Court |
| February 24, 2026 |
24.02.2026: Cancellation of registration u/s 29 must form an independent opinion, cancellation based on request or direction from the investigating wing amounts to acting under dictation and is legally impermissible: Gauhati High Court |
| February 24, 2026 |
24.02.2026: Post amendment w.e.f. 01.01.2022, Fine in lieu of confiscation under Section 130(2) is post-adjudication, not provisional: Kerala High Court |
| February 23, 2026 |
23.02.2026: Where GST registration is cancelled only due to continuous non-filing of returns, and not on grounds of fraud or tax evasion, courts may grant relief: |
| February 23, 2026 |
23.02.2026: Total recovery cannot exceed the cumulative statutory pre-deposit required at the first and second appellate stages: Calcutta High Court |
| February 21, 2026 |
21.02.2026: GSTN enables online withdrawal from Rule 14A via Form GST REG-32 |
| February 21, 2026 |
21.02.2026: When a demand under specific heads has already been dropped in parallel proceedings, the same cannot be confirmed again in another assessment order: Madras High Court |
| February 21, 2026 |
21.02.2026: Videography of summons proceedings u/s 70 may be allowed where the petitioner is willing to bear the cost, enhancing transparency in the inquiry: Bombay High Court |
| February 20, 2026 |
20.02.2026: Section 74 provides a graded reduced penalty scheme which must be exercised within prescribed timelines, Courts are unlikely to interfere in writ in case of failure to opt for the reduced penalty framework: Madras High Court |
| February 20, 2026 |
20.02.2026: GSTN issued Advisory on Interest Collection & GSTR-3B Enhancements, same shall be available from February-2026 period |
| February 19, 2026 |
19.02.2026: Limitation for filing appeal under Section 107 commences only upon valid service of the adjudication order: Calcutta High Court |
| February 19, 2026 |
19.02.2026: Even though Rule 108(1) primarily mandates electronic filing, courts may permit manual filing where electronic filing is not feasible due to genuine technical issues: Madhya Pradesh High Court |
| February 18, 2026 |
18.02.2026: When the due date for filing Annual Return is extended by notification, the limitation period under Section 73(10) (three years) is computed from the extended due date: Gauhati High Court |
| February 18, 2026 |
18.02.2026: “Reasons to believe” must be recorded u/s 69 but need not necessarily be supplied to the accused; however, written “grounds of arrest” must be furnished to the accused: Allahabad High Court |