| October 24, 2024 |
Cost of free diesel provided by the recipient cannot be added to the value of the GTA service for the purpose of determining GST liability: Uttarakhand High Court |
| October 19, 2024 |
Mere fact that the export receipts received in a bank account of a branch other than that providing service, not a ground to deny refund: Delhi High Court |
| October 17, 2024 |
ITC benefit could not be denied solely on the basis of non-electronic filing relevant forms, which is due to non-functioning of portal: Bombay High Court |
| October 3, 2024 |
Authorities can only restrict the usage of the available ITC but cannot force future credits to be blocked: Delhi High Court |
| October 1, 2024 |
Rule 86B restricting use of ITC in the Electronic Credit Ledger for releasing Output tax, appears to be ultra vires, due to no statutory backing: Himachal Pradesh High Court |
| September 27, 2024 |
Field officer placing reliance on inquiries from unnamed nearby shop owners could not justify the non-existent of place of business: Delhi High Court |
| September 26, 2024 |
Department must consider/resolve the petitioner’s objections filed u/r Rule 159 within a reasonable timeframe, to prevent the rule from becoming a mere formality: Rajasthan High Court |
| September 25, 2024 |
Government’s failure to obtain a recommendation from the GST Council before issuing notification rendered the extension of time limits legally untenable: Gauhati High Court |
| September 24, 2024 |
No notification was issued u/s 168A to extend the limitation period for the financial year 2018-19, Order passed beyond such limitation period is without jurisdiction: Gauhati High Court |
| September 18, 2024 |
Re-attachment order passed u/s 83 without any fresh justification, is arbitrary: Allahabad High Court |
